Miraflore Ndifon
Christopher Moreland
MMW 13
8/22/2023
Commented [1]: Please make sure not to resolve my
comments because our professor needs to see them to
be able to grade them
Abstract
This paper explores the complex variety of political power dynamics and governance
structures during the crucial year of 1260 CE in the United States, within the wider backdrop of
1250 to 1799 CE. By delving into a myriad of erudite compositions spanning various literary
forms and scholarly publications, the investigation endeavors to illuminate the metamorphic
occurrences within the realm of politics during this particular epoch. These sources provide
distinct perspectives on the intricate historical events, deciphering the intricate relationship
between specific regional conditions and broader geopolitical changes, particularly in the Middle
East, Central Asia, and Galilee.
Political power and governance structures during the 1260 CE
The year 1260 CE is a watershed moment in human history, marked by a cascade of
seismic political shifts felt all around the globe. Understanding the complex power dynamics and
governance systems is of utmost importance as different areas face different problems and
possibilities. The reason of this article is to observe the problematic dynamics at play in the
formation of political strength constructions for the duration of this duration of profound change.
This find out about attracts on a extensive range of tutorial sources in an effort to supply a
thorough draw close of the background. Understanding the dynamics of power, the complexities
of governance, and the elements that form societies requires a thorough investigation of the
political local weather in 1260 CE. The period of 1260 CE was a significant turning point in
human history, initiating a period of significant global changes that had far-reaching effects. This
question employs a wide range of scholarly allusions to shed light on the past circumstances in
an effort to decipher the complex systems that shaped political power structures at this pivotal
moment.
Political power dynamics and governance structure:
The concept of “politic force fluctuations” is employed to elucidate the intricate dance and
reciprocal influence of diverse individuals, collectives, and establishments within a governmental
framework. The shaping of power in a society is influenced by the intricate interplay of these
processes. The establishment of a nation or organization’s governing framework generally arises
from a complex interplay of deliberations, conflicts, coalitions, and strategies. The arrangement
of a community’s governing framework is the intricate web of regulations and customs put in
place to oversee the manner in which dominion and influence are allocated and employed.
Commented [2]: I believe since your research is well
thought out and your essay is thoroughly written your
title can be a bit more intriguing
Commented [3]: I really like this sentence that you
included because it adds a lot of clarification for your
thesis
Commented [4]: I believe this sentence sounds a bit
repetitive of the last two sentences as it summarizes
them up. I would recommend either eliminating this
sentences or connecting it to the research you found
and how it will add to your thesis.
Commented [5]: This sentence does not make much
sense to me. You can try to take out a few words that
will make it flow better.
Commented [6]: Although this can be explained in your
analysis, I believe this will sound much more
informative if you are as specific as possible in listing
the turning point that occurred. What did the turning
point achieve? Why?
Commented [7]: Nice job
Commented [8]: I would recommend condensing and
combining these two sentences.
Theoretical Foundations:
In his book “Revolution: Structure and Meaning in World History,” Goldstone lays forth a
conceptual framework for analyzing revolutionary movements. The book covers a vast period of
time, yet its insights on revolution’s structural aspects and deeper meanings are invaluable. The
political climate of 1260 CE may be analyzed through the lens of revolutionary dynamics, which
are often marked by drastic transitions in political power. By adapting Goldstone’s ideas to this
particular historical setting, we can examine how systemic factors and the ambitions of different
individuals drove power shifts and changes. This theoretical framework provides a prism through
which to examine the causes, developments, and results of this historic year’s political upheavals.
Perspectives from the Regions:
In “The History of Galilee, 47 BCE to 1260 CE,” Silver takes readers on a tour through the
political development of Galilee over a long period of time. The book goes beyond a simple
history to explore the nuances of regional administration’s development and evolution.
Understanding the unique political history of Galilee allows us to see how regional power
dynamics relate to the larger geopolitical picture. Understanding how regional government
systems reacted to external forces and internal currents in the key year of 1260 CE may be aided
by looking at the instance of Galilee. A more complete picture of the governance dynamics of
the period may be pieced together with the help of this detailed analysis of the elements that
either strengthened the current authority or prompted challenges to it.
Commented [9]: Instead of summarizing elaborate
further as it will explain why the research you found is
important to answering your research question.
Commented [10]: I understand what you mean, but I
don’t feel as if you are explaining well enough why it is
important to understand this? Also explain what it is for
people who might not know what you are talking about.
Aspects of the Natural World:
Environmental factors frequently influence the political dynamic. The article by Chen et
al. titled “Ecological and Societal Effects of Central Asian Streamflow Variation over the Past
Eight Centuries” analyzes the impact of streamflow shifts in Central Asia on ecological and
social factors. This investigation into the possible relationship between weather and government
sheds light on how environmental elements may have impacted the balance of power in Central
Asian politics around the year 1260 CE.
Political processes are frequently slightly influenced by environmental causes, but these
factors remain largely unacknowledged. Research by Chen et al., titled “Ecological and Societal
Effects of Central Asian Streamflow Variation over the Past Eight Centuries,” explores the
effects that changes in streamflow have had on Central Asia’s ecosystems and human societies.
Understanding the relationship between environmental conditions and political processes is
enriched by this study’s recognition of the possible link between climate flux and governance
structures. By looking at what happened in Central Asia about 1260 CE, we may learn more
about how climate change may have exacerbated existing power relations or prompted new ways
of governing. This research from the scientific community broadens our perspective by
illuminating the interplay between nature and human systems of power throughout this pivotal
era.
Commented [11]: Instead of constantly saying
“understanding” use synonyms that will help your
writing not sound repetitive.
Environment and Administration:
Research by Gamble, Powers, and Hackett titled “Central Tibetan Famines 1280-1400”
looks at the relationship between climatic changes and governmental structures during famine
times in Central Tibet. This source helps us comprehend how climate change after 1260 CE
could have affected governing institutions by delving into the relationship between
environmental shifts and the capacity for political resilience.
In their paper “Central Tibetan Famines 1280-1400,” Gamble, Powers, and Hackett
investigate the relationship between climatic variability and control mechanisms during times of
famine in Central Tibet. This source helps us understand how climate change after 1260 CE may
have influenced political systems by deconstructing the link between environmental change and
political resilience. It is possible that changes in power dynamics and approaches to leadership
might be precipitated by gaining insight into the social battles induced by climatic catastrophes.
This study provides a holistic look at how civilizations have dealt with periods of shortage and
turmoil by highlighting the complex relationship between environmental stresses and political
solutions.
Formation of States and the Spread of Information. The article “Wisdom Is Welcome
Where It Comes From: War, Diffusion, and State Formation in Scandinavia” by Grynaviski and
Steinsson analyzes the importance of wars and the spread of knowledge in establishing
Scandinavian states. This article gives insight on the change in political power through time by
examining the growth of regional government. The establishment of states and power
distribution. The article “Wisdom Is Welcome Wherever It Comes From: War, Diffusion, and
State Formation in Scandinavia,” written by Grynaviski and Steinsson, investigates the processes
of state development in Scandinavia, with an emphasis on the roles played by combat and the
Commented [12]: You can shorten this down so you are
able to take out any unnecessary information.
Commented [13]: You do not need to mention this,
especially if you have already mentioned it in the same
paragraph.
spread of knowledge. Using the growth of regional government as a lens, this essay reveals the
change in political influence through time. An improved understanding of state development and
power structures circa 1260 CE is provided by this source. It forces us to ponder how struggles
and the sharing of ideas have contributed to the formation of new models of government at this
critical moment. Grynaviski and Steinsson’s work sheds light on the larger global currents that
flowed through this era by providing a detailed knowledge of the complicated processes that
supported the consolidation of political power in a specific location on about 1260 CE are better
understood with the help of this source.
Conclusion:
This research seeks to understand the political power dynamics and governance systems
that influenced the year 1260 CE by evaluating these many sources. These books provide light
on how structural, regional, environmental, and knowledge-driven variables all shaped political
shifts throughout this crucial era. This comparative research sheds light on the workings of
power and government in 1260 CE by painting a nuanced picture of the political environment.
We may create a varied and complete narrative of the political landscape at this important time in
history by weaving together insights from theoretical frameworks, regional subtleties,
environmental effects, and the dynamic interaction between knowledge and state formation.
When taken together, they provide a more nuanced picture of the complexity of government, the
adaptive tactics of political actors, and the lasting legacies that were born out of the events of
1260 CE. This cross-cultural comparison reveals the complex web of interconnected power
structures that has persisted through the ages.
References
Goldstone, J. A. (2020). Revolution: Structure and Meaning in World History. Said Amir
Arjomand, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. Pp. 400. $55.00 cloth. ISBN:
9780226026848. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 52(2), 371-372.
Silver, M. M. (2021). The History of Galilee, 47 BCE to 1260 CE: From Josephus and Jesus to
the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield.
Chen, F., Yuan, Y., Trouet, V., Buntgen, U., Esper, J., Chen, F., … & Zhang, H. (2022).
Ecological and societal effects of Central Asian streamflow variation over the past eight
centuries. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 5(1), 27.
Gamble, R., Powers, J., & Hackett, P. (2022). Central Tibetan famines 1280-1400: when
premodern climate change and bad governance starved Tibet. Bulletin of the School of Oriental
and African Studies, 85(2), 215-233.
Grynaviski, E., & Steinsson, S. (2023). Wisdom Is Welcome Wherever It Comes From: War,
Diffusion, and State Formation in Scandinavia. International Organization, 77(2), 294-323.
Commented [14]: Make sure you do hanging indent
which can be done by clicking “format” then “align and
indent” then “indentation options” then change “none”
to “hanging” then apply
Dear Reader Letter
Kindly spare a moment to assess this preliminary version and offer your insights on how it could
be enhanced to deliver a more comprehensive exploration of the intricate interplay of political
authority and governing structures prevalent during the year 1260 CE. The insights you provide
will be of immense worth in enhancing the ultimate outcome. The draft’s major strength is the in-
depth analysis of the topic’s many facets. Comprehensive historical comprehension is achieved
by the use of several scholarly materials, such as books and academic publications. Galilee,
Central Asia, and the Middle East are all represented, giving the reader a well-rounded
understanding of the topic. Incorporating theoretical frameworks like Goldstone’s “Revolution:
Structure and Meaning in World History” greatly enhances the study by allowing for more
nuanced parallels between revolutionary processes and the changes to political institutions that
occurred about 1260 CE. There is a lot of useful material in the draft, however it might need
some tidying up so that everything reads smoothly. To minimize abrupt shifts, certain parts may
need further explanation or tying together. In addition, certain aspects of the study might go into
further detail to round out the picture. It was difficult to provide regional viewpoints with theme
notions within the word restriction that was set throughout the writing phase. Feedback on the
success of this balance between researching the many sources and keeping the story consistent
would be highly welcomed. This paper’s overarching goal is to examine the complicated
relationship between political power and governing structures in the seminal year of 1260 CE,
shedding light on the ways in which revolutions, climate change, and the emergence of new
states all contributed to the development of the political landscape at the time. If I were granted
an additional pair of days to dedicate to refining this preliminary version, my primary objective
would revolve around enhancing the overall cohesion and structure of the document. As a
Commented [15]: I agree with you that most of your
paragraphs provide an in depth analysis
Commented [16]: I also agree with this. Make sure to
not only work on how smoothly the sentences sound,
but also, make sure there are no repetitive sentences
or any unnecessary information that could be cut out.
component of this procedure, it is advisable to thoroughly examine the interrelations amidst
various elements to ensure their coherence and seamless progression. To provide a more nuanced
view of how environmental issues affected political evolution, I would go further into specific
case studies and historical settings, especially in Central Asia.
Questions for Readers: Does the analysis benefit from the theoretical frameworks that have been
selected, such as Goldstone’s work, or are there other frameworks that should be taken into
account?
a. Do you find the transitions between sections smooth and logical, or do they need further
improvement to enhance the overall flow of the paper?
b. How effectively does the argument linking theoretical foundations and perspectives come
across? Are there suggestions for strengthening this connection?
c. Is the conclusion sufficiently comprehensive in summarizing the diverse factors influencing
political power in 1260 CE, or should specific elements be emphasized more?
Commented [17]: I did not know much about your topic
before reading this paper, but from what I can see I
believe the frameworks mentioned play an effective
role and benefits in analyzing the question.
Commented [18]: They are not choppy by no means,
however a trick I like to do is to use the first and last
sentence to connect back to what was just previously
talked about and what will be talked about. This way
there is no need to even question if the paper flows
good.
Commented [19]: You are effective with your choice of
linking evidence, however I suggest you can strengthen
this connection by using more of your own
opinionated thoughts that can be backed up by the
reading.
Commented [20]: Your conclusion was good, but I
would like to see something different from what was
mentioned in the introduction. I would also recommend
you try not to start off a majority of the sentences the
same way. Instead don’t keep mentioning it since we
already know what you are talking about. You can
introduce a new topic that connects to your argument
that can also lead to a whole new research paper.