Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different.

At the beginning of this exercise I was unsure if my choices would have different consequences than they did. So, for example, I expected that directing resources to local clinics for medical emergencies would have a greater impact on public health than if I had chosen to focus them towards hospitals. This would make it easier for people to access care. The reality was that people couldn’t access the services they required due to a lack of supplies and staffing in these clinics. It was a stark contrast to what I expected, as most people believe that clinics are more equipped and accessible than hospitals in dealing with medical emergencies.

My decision to reduce funding for public transport in order to increase police presence was another one that produced unexpected results. This seemed to be a good way to increase street security. However, it was not an easy decision to make. It led to higher crime rates because fewer people have reliable transport options, making them more likely to become criminal targets. This is a reminder about how complicated and difficult social problems are and the importance of careful thought when attempting to find a solution.

Overall, while some of my decisions resulted in outcomes approximating what I expected them too, others produced completely unexpected results – demonstrating just how difficult predicting long-term impacts can be when it comes to tackling complex social issues such as those presented here. Leaders involved in problem solving or policy formulation such as this need to consider all possible outcomes before they decide on a plan of action. This will ensure that the best solutions are created for all stakeholders and avoid unintended consequences.