As you reflect on Meilaender’s readings, what is his distinction between procreation and reproduction, as well as that of being begotten versus being made? Do you agree with his description?

Meilaender distinguishes between reproduction and procreation in his readings by stating that the former involves both parents, while the latter is any act of creating or manufacturing something. He explains that when couples procreate they are engaging in “an act of love” with intentionality, while reproducing can occur through artificial means such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). This distinction is crucial because it emphasizes the importance of intent in creating relationships and families.

Meilaender distinguishes between being born and being created by differentiating how two individuals intend to have children. This is in contrast with IVF, which uses cells taken from other donors than the mother or father. He believes that there is value placed on knowing one’s biological roots – for example, genetic information about inherited traits – as this contributes to understanding one’s identity more fully.

I do agree with Meilaender’s description as I think his points are valid. It is certainly true that having an intentional relationship between parents at conception results in stronger bonds within families; however, I do not believe that one way of forming a family should be seen as better than another – whether through traditional or alternative means – since each type will bring its own unique set of joys and challenges for those involved.