Cognitive behavior theory and rational emotive behaviour theory
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, (CBT), and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy(REBT) both use evidence-based psychotherapeutic methods that target negative thoughts and beliefs in order to enhance emotional well-being. Although they have some commonalities, their theories and methods are different.
The idea behind CBT is that negative emotions or behaviors can be maintained by unfounded and unreasonable thoughts. It also teaches that changing those thoughts can result in more positive emotions. This includes recognizing and challenging negative thoughts as well as developing strategies for coping and engaging in behavior interventions to improve positive behaviors.
The other is REBT, which believes negative emotions or behaviors can not be caused externally but are caused by irrational thoughts and attitudes. REBT works by challenging unfounded beliefs and substituting them with rationaler and more adaptive ideas. It involves generating new beliefs and challenging irrational beliefs.
CBT as well as REBT follow a systematic and direct approach. They place emphasis on the role and responsibility of the therapist for facilitating changes. REBT, however, tends to be more confrontational and philosophical than CBT. CBT, on the other hand, is more collaborative and behavioral.
When deciding which therapeutic approach to use with clients, it is important to consider the client’s individual needs and preferences, as well as the nature of the presenting problem. If clients are experiencing distorted thinking and/or negative behavior, then CBT might be more suitable. However, if they are dealing with unreasonable beliefs or attitudes, REBT could be the best fit. Consider that many therapists incorporate both CBT or REBT techniques into their work, depending on client needs.